In 2013 the U.S. Supreme court ruled in an important case that the police could not 'force' a motorist to take a blood or breath test without first obtaining a warrant from a judge. ( Missouri v. McNeely ) After that decision, many states including California changed their arrest procedure making a judge available 24/ 7 telephonically to issue warrants for blood tests. However, it was still a crime in most states to refuse to voluntarily agree to take a test. So the question was, shouldn't a driver have the right to refuse a 'search and seizure' of his blood and force the police to obtain a warrant ? Especially since many times the officer didn't want the headache of getting a warrant to respect the driver's constitutional rights, and instead choose to charge the more serious 'test refusal'. Now the U.S. Supreme court will weigh in once again on the issue and has decided to hear oral argument on three cases that present that issue. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/12/11/supreme-court-drunk-driving-blood-alcohol-tests/77165668/
We Are Your Web Based DUI Defense Firm. Is it inconvenient for you to drive to a law firm? Meet Phillips DUI Defense. We serve clients in the Gold Country. Now a great DUI lawyer is never more than a mouse click away. Meet with us by phone or video, and on most cases, you never even have to go to court.